Why Mercator exists.

The Mercator projection, published in 1569, is conformal. At any sufficiently small location, angles and shapes are preserved. A line of constant compass bearing, or rhumb line, is straight on the map. That property is valuable for navigation, although the shortest route between two distant points is generally a great-circle route on a sphere, not a rhumb line.

Mercator is not a mistake. The problem begins when a map designed around one property is used to answer a different question.

Section references[3]

Why the north looks larger.

On the spherical Mercator projection, local linear scale grows as 1 / cos φ, where φ is latitude. Local area scale therefore grows as 1 / cos² φ, relative to the equator. At 60° latitude a tiny area appears four times as large; at 80° it appears about 33.2 times as large. The same happens south of the equator. The poles are infinitely far away and cannot be shown.

These are local factors, not a single correction factor for a whole country. A large region spans many latitudes. Its total map area depends on integrating distortion across the region. Our tool clearly separates the local calculation from the area of a finite patch.

Section references[3]

The little map lab

An area on the move.

−80°80°60°
Equal Earth2018
Mercator1569
Fixed at the equatorSame area, moved north or south
Mercator local area factor4.00 ×
Equal Earth area factor1.00 ×

Compare the two patches within each panel. Both have equal area on the globe.

The comparison that matters.

PropertyMercatorEqual Earth
Relative areaDistorted away from the equatorPreserved
Local anglesPreservedNot preserved everywhere
PolesCannot be representedFinite polar lines
Good questionWhat is a constant bearing?How large are regions relative to each other?

Section references[1][3]

Do not compare the wrong things.

Web Mercator, familiar from interactive web maps, uses a spherical-style formula with geographic coordinates commonly associated with an ellipsoid. It is not precisely the same as an ellipsoidal Mercator projection. Our educational comparison uses a sphere for both projections and clips Mercator near ±85.05°. No product map is regenerated from this demonstration.

Give students both maps and a globe. Ask what each representation makes easy to see, what it hides and which question would be unfair to ask of it.

Section references[3]